Monthly Archives: July 2008

Corporate social media use: lessons learnt

The iPhone craze is sweeping the world at the moment and it seems like just about everyone wants one (I would too but after breaking my last phone I paid good money for and seeing the same thing happen to a few friends, I am now of the belief that no one should pay money for a mobile phone, ruling the iPhone out for me). In Australia, three out of the four major mobile operators have secured the iPhone – Optus, Vodafone and Telstra. The fourth, 3 Mobile, seems to be having a tougher time doing a deal with Apple and so interestingly, they turned to social media to help them in their quest.

They set up a blog so that they could inform customers of what was happening with their iPhone negotiations with Apple, and so that Apple could hopefully see how much Three’s customers wanted the iPhone. It was an interesting ploy and one that seemed to really polarize people.

Some people were grateful that Three were being so open and honest with them, in keeping them informed about developments on the iPhone and allowing them to interact directly with Three and other Three customers.

Other people saw it as a desperate marketing ploy to get the iPhone on the Three network, and found it pathetic that Three couldn’t have negotiated with Apple themselves and instead had to turn to their customers to try and convince Apple that Three should carry the iPhone.

Others saw it as a cynical marketing exercise, either as a different take on the ‘register your interest in the iPhone’ pages that the other carriers have had, or a move to see just how many customers they might lose if they weren’t to offer the iPhone.

Three is obviously not a ‘media-facing company’ in the traditional sense, not relying on the mainstream media to generate an income. But it would be interesting to see what sort of reaction people would have to a blog set up in a similar fashion by a media-facing organisation like the AFL. If the league was to suddenly directly interface with its fans and ask them questions about elements of the game, would the fans accuse it of admitting that it was out of touch with its public, or would they see it as an opportunity for greater involvement in the development of the game.

The Three blog is shutting down as of 5pm today, having been open for a week, and it is uncertain as to why this is actually happening. Once again this move has polarised people, who are either disappointed that Three hasn’t secured the iPhone yet or a wondering why the blog is really shutting down.

From this experience it is easy to see why media-facing companies are reluctant to embrace social media. There is so much more control possible in the mainstream media, whereas Three has had a real mixed response from this experience – there have been plenty of people singing its phrases, but also plenty of vitriol from people too, and there is a sense that this experience has devalued the Three brand in the eyes of some at least. I wonder if the same thing would happen to the AFL…

Why blog? (Why bother?)

Firstly, hello and welcome back to New Media Mogul after a brief break in transmission there. Don’t ever let it be said that it is easy to maintain a blog. I’ve found that with other pressures on me, and deadlines due, the blog is the first thing that suffers.

It’s interesting, because the question of ‘Why blog?’ or more broadly ‘Why create social media?’ is one of the questions I am attempting to answer in my research. Reflecting on the creation of New Media Mogul, it came about because I wanted a focal point to force me to write on a regular basis and keep my skills sharp as I spent a number of years researching social media.

Lately I’ve been writing for other purposes, mainly working on a paper I’m going to present at the ANZCA conference in Wellington, New Zealand next week so I haven’t needed to turn to the blog to keep the flow of ideas happening.

But people create social media for a variety of reasons and although I’d (somewhat naively) like to think that it’s because they have a great interest in the subject of their media, I don’t think this is always the case.

There are people like me who blog because it is part of their professional practices – they want to be able to write regularly, network with other like-minded bloggers and build up a reputation.

There are people with stories to tell, although with these types, commercial interests often take over. These people will usually end up being freelance writers who will wind up working on a professional blog, or appearing in a newspaper column or else their blog will be turned into a book (I can think of a few times that this last scenario has occured).

There are people who do it for the attention and fame that comes with it, and obviously for the associated dollars too (Just think of celebrity blogger Perez Hilton who I’ve noticed recently has started doing a segment on the Nova radio network).

Then there are people who don’t seem to derive a lot of fame from creating citizen media. So what is the deal with these people? Are they just the unlucky ones whose creations haven’t been quirky or interesting enough to achieve the fame of someone like Perez Hilton, or whose writing or presentation style or other media skills isn’t good enough to do this in a professional sense?